Reliability and Validity of HIV Self-Reported Result in Determining HIV Prevalence in a Region with High HIV Prevalence
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Studies of health care outcomes and HIV intervention programs depends on HIV results to accurately enroll HIV positive people in intervention programs. While- several studies have been done around HIV self-reported result, there is still a paucity of data on the reliability and validity of data from self-reported HIV result. This study sought to determine the reliability and validity of self-reported HIV result in a region with high HIV burden. This study used a prospective cohort study design. A random sample of participants aged 15-64 years living in Gem Sub-County were enrolled and later followed up within one year for testing. A total of 5955 respondents were considered for this analysis, 63.5% were women and 36.5% men. HIV prevalence among the sampled population was 15.4%, the burden of HIV was relatively high among women (16.2%) compared to men (12.1 %). Agreement between self-reported and actual HIV result was 96.9% with a very good Cohen's kappa of 0.869(95%CJ= 0.8501 - 0.8874). Males (kappa= 0.874, 95%CJ 0.841 - 0.907) presented slightly higher agreement than women (kappa= 0.866, 95%CJ 0.843 - 0.889). The sensitivity of HIV self-reported result was 0.81, 95%CI (0.784 -0.836) and a specificity of 0.997, 95%CJ (0.995-0.998) with an accuracy of 0.97, 95%CI (0.965-0.974). HIV self-reported result had a higher positive predictive value of 0.978, 95%CI (0.964-0.987) with a comparatively slightly lower negative predictive value of 0.968, 95%CI (0.963-0.973). Those aged 45 - 49 years (OR 11.19 95%CI 3.641 - 34.413), had knowledge of partner's HIV status (OR= 3.44, 95%CI 2.290 - 5.192, p<0.001) and tested previously as couples (OR= 0.47, 95%CI 0.271 - 0.817, p = 0.007) had a statistically significant increased odds of correctly reporting their HIV status. In conclusion, self-reported positive status provides an accurate measure of HIV status, hence self-reported sero-positivity should be treated as HIV positive for purposes of surveillance and equally for inclusion into interventions which require HIV positive individuals.