Developing the STOE Framework and Implementation Architecture: A Dual Model for e-Health Implementation in Resource-Constrained Public Healthcare Settings of Western Kenya
| dc.contributor.author | Ondulo, Jasper | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liyala, Samuel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Adong, Grace | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aduda, Dickens | |
| dc.contributor.author | Matoke, Nahason | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-25T13:23:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-18 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Well-funded e-Health pilot projects in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) consistently fail to achieve sustainable integration into routine practice. Existing frameworks address single dimensions of this problem, lacking integrated, multi-level perspectives and actionable roadmaps. This paper presents the development and empirical validation of the STOE (Social-Technological-Organisational-Environmental) Framework and its complementary Implementation Architecture, a dual model for resource-constrained public healthcare settings. We employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design across three public healthcare facilities in Western Kenya. Following a deductive-inductive process, we deductively constructed the STOE Framework by synthesising Normalisation Process Theory, the Technology-Organisation-Environment framework, and the Four-in-Balance Model. This a priori model was then inductively tested through quantitative surveys (n=108 healthcare providers) and qualitative interviews (n=21 key informants). Empirical data confirmed the framework's validity. Implementation failures stemmed from structural disconnects across nested STOE contexts, not isolated technical deficits. Three disconnect patterns emerged: (1) environmental policy uncertainty paralysing organizational decision-making (E→O); (2) technologies procured without frontline user input leading to systematic social rejection (S↔T); and (3) fragmented funding creating unsustainable donor- dependent pilots that collapsed post-completion (E→O→S cascade). The validated dual framework offers a pragmatic two-stage approach for resource-constrained health systems: diagnose systemic weaknesses using the STOE lens, then target interventions precisely using the architectural blueprint. This moves the field beyond checklist-style models toward integrated diagnosis and action. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ondulo, J., Liyala, S., Adong, G., Aduda, D., & Matoke, N. (2026). Developing the STOE Framework and Implementation Architecture: A Dual Model for e-Health Implementation in Resource- Constrained Public Healthcare Settings of Western Kenya. Journal of Research and Academic Writing, 3(1), 96-103. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 3007-5343 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.jooust.ac.ke/handle/123456789/15263 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Journal of Research and Academic Writing | |
| dc.subject | e-Health | |
| dc.subject | Implementation | |
| dc.subject | Public healthcare | |
| dc.subject | Resources | |
| dc.title | Developing the STOE Framework and Implementation Architecture: A Dual Model for e-Health Implementation in Resource-Constrained Public Healthcare Settings of Western Kenya | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Ondulo_ Developing the STOE Framework and Implementation Architecture-A Dual Model for E-Health Implementation in Resource-Constrained Public Healthcare Settings of Western Kenya.pdf
- Size:
- 349.17 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
